Essentializing the DepEd Matatag Curriculum in Grade 4: Issues, Challenges, and Administrative Interventions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21296959Keywords:
Administration and Supervision, MATATAG Curriculum implementation, curriculum effectiveness, descriptive‑correlational method, BoholAbstract
This study examined the implementation of the DepEd MATATAG Curriculum in Grade 4 in the Trinidad II District, Division of Bohol, focusing on its level of implementation, perceived effectiveness, issues and concerns encountered, and the relationship between curriculum implementation and effectiveness. A descriptive–correlational research design was employed involving 15 Grade 4 teachers and 13 school heads from 13 public elementary schools. Data were collected using researcher-developed questionnaires anchored on DepEd Orders No. 010, s. 2024 and No. 012, s. 2024 and analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation, and Pearson Product–Moment Correlation. Findings revealed that the MATATAG Curriculum was implemented to a high degree overall (M = 4.30). Curriculum Planning and Preparation, Teacher Preparedness and Training, and Assessment Alignment and Use of Results were rated as highly implemented, while Teaching–Learning Resources and Materials obtained comparatively lower ratings, indicating the need for continued resource support. The curriculum was likewise perceived as effective (M = 4.13), particularly in strengthening foundational literacy and numeracy skills, promoting 21st-century competencies, and supporting learner-centered instruction. However, curriculum decongestion was perceived as less fully achieved than other curriculum features. Major implementation concerns included curriculum planning and pacing, teacher training and preparedness, teaching load or class size, adequacy of teaching–learning resources, and stakeholder support. Correlation analysis revealed a very strong and statistically significant positive relationship between curriculum implementation and perceived effectiveness (r = .896, p < .001). The findings suggest that strengthening instructional leadership, professional development, resource provision, and implementation support mechanisms may further enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of the MATATAG Curriculum implementation in Grade 4.
References
Abad, L., & Hattie, J. (2025). The impact of teaching materials on instructional design and teacher development. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1577721.
Abate, T., & Mishore, E. (2024). Alignment analysis between teacher-made tests and the learning objectives in a selected school of the central regional state of Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10. Shttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31869.
Ahmad, A., & Mehmood, M. (2022). Alignment between Biology Curriculum Objectives and Assessment at Higher Secondary Level. Review of Education, Administration & Law. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v5i4.283.
American Institutes for Research. (2015). Concerns‑Based Adoption Model (CBAM). https://www.air.org/resource/publications-concerns-based-adoption-model-cbam
Badajos, M., Fulgencio, M. D., Plando, D., & Opingo, K. M. M. (2025). The Impact of 'Matatag' Curriculum Implementation in the Foundation Stage of Education. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 5(7), 7–12. [https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2025.5.7.2)
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Bensurto, C. D., & Bernardino, L. T. (2025). Lived experiences of teachers in challenging areas in the implementation of matatag curriculum. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(5), 2610–2624. [https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.05.35)
Bentayao, G. J., Cagape, W., & Quibod, C. P. G. (2024). SCHOOL HEAD’S MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON POLICY CHANGES IN DAVAO CITY: MATATAG CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION IN FOCUS. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 25–32. [https://doi.org/10.36713/epra18886)
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364. [https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138871)
Buday, D., & Galigao, R. (2025). Instructional Supervision and Curriculum Integration as Drivers of Educational Quality: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.637.
Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. (2003). Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347–373. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004347.
Chen, A., Brown, S., Mark, K., & McBane, S. (2023). An overview of Instructional approaches and decision-making strategies to curtail curricular overload. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 87 8, 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2022.12.001.
Choppin, J., Mcduffie, A., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2020). The role of instructional materials in the relationship between the official curriculum and the enacted curriculum. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1855376.
Clark, I. (2012). Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.
Dadul, M. A. C., Labutap, R. G., Arigon, N. P. B., Dacuno, K. J. D., & Biasong, M. D. R. (2025). Teachers’ sentiments on the implementation of DepEd MATATAG curriculum. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i6.19
D'Eon, M. (2023). The overcrowded curriculum is alarming. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 14, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78084.
Department of Education. (2024, July 23). DO 010, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/07/23/july-23-2024-do-010-s-2024-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-matatag-curriculum/
Department of Education. (2024, September 18). DO 012, s. 2024: Amendment to DO 010, s. 2024 (Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/09/18/september-18-2024-do-012-s-2024-amendment-to-deped-order-no-010-s-2024-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-matatag-curriculum/
Donoghue, A., Navarro, K., Diederich, E., Auerbach, M., & Cheng, A. (2021). Deliberate practice and mastery learning in resuscitation education: A scoping review. Resuscitation Plus, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100137.
Duhaylungsod, A., & Galigao, R. (2025). Empowering educators: Strengthening teacher training and development for global education reform. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences). https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0403491
Elardo, A. L. A. (2025). Teachers’ preparedness, needs, and challenges in the implementation of MATATAG curriculum. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(5), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i05.020
Fuentes, M. (2025). Teacher experiences, challenges, and support needs in the implementation of the Philippine MATATAG curriculum: An integrative literature review. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(12), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.716
G, B. E., Troy, D. G. R., Fae, R. T. A., Kristel, S. S., & Louis, G. L. B. (2024). A new era of learning: The MATATAG curriculum and its impact on fourth-grade students’ academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(6), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.6.3565
Hadisaputra, P., Haryadi, L., Zuhri, M., Thohri, M., & Zulkifli, M. (2024). The Role of Teachers in Curriculum Management Implementation: A Narrative Literature Review on Challenges, Best Practices, and Professional Development. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i51338.
Hallinger, P. (2019). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48, 209 - 230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772
Hallinger, P., Hallinger, P., Walker, A., Nguyen, D., Truong, T., & Nguyen, T. (2017). Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: A preliminary model. Journal of Educational Administration, 55, 222-239. [https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-11-2015-0106
Jamero, A., & Accad, M. (2025). Antecedents of Matatag Curriculum Implementation in Region XII: Creating a Model for its Future Success. International Journal of Science, Architecture, Technology and Environment. https://doi.org/10.63680/xwerre455b675535.
Kim, A. (2025). Impact of Systematic Support in Teacher Education and Professional Development on Training-Teaching Alignment and Instructional Quality. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00154-3.
Kraft, M., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88, 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268.
Labag, S. A. (2025). MANAGING CHANGE: SCHOOL HEADS' RESILIENCE AND STRATEGIC ADAPTATION IN DIRECTING CHALLENGES IN TRANSITION OF K-12 TO MATATAG CURRICULUM. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 576-582. [https://doi.org/10.36713/epra21174)
Lagbao, J. (2024). INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MATATAG CURRICULUM: VIEWS OF THE TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17629.
Lestari, S., & Yusuf, F. (2025). Aligning Assessment Practices with Learning Objectives: A Case of EFL Classes in Indonesia. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics). https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1973.
Lorono, R. (2025). Matatag curriculum implementation: Teachers’ readiness, challenges, and recommendations. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(2), 127–137. [https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.470201)
Magallanes, K. M., Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2022). The Philippine teachers’ concerns about educational reform using CBAM. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 962681. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.962681
Maguate, G. (2024). Cultural Responsiveness and Educational Equity: Exploring the MATATAG Curriculum in the Light of Sociocultural Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4873098.
Manizabayo, P., & Kachchhap, S. (2025). Teacher Preparedness, Availability of Teaching Materials, and the Implementation of Competence-based Curriculum. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.1.09.
Maraveles, J., & Ducot, L. (2025). Challenges encountered by teachers in the implementation of the matatag curriculum. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(5), 723–732. [ https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.400510)
Miller, J. P. (1990). What are schools for? Holistic education in American culture. Holistic Education Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=A0KcAAAAMAAJ
Miller, J. P. (2007). The holistic curriculum (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=SZZDfp3ddoAC
Mok, S., & Staub, F. (2021). Does coaching, mentoring, and supervision matter for pre-service teachers’ planning skills and clarity of instruction? A meta-analysis of (quasi-)experimental studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103484.
Motel, G. (2025). Teachers’ Narratives on Preparedness and Content Delivery in the Implementation of the Matatag Curriculum. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.60132/jip.v3i2.487.
Nakato, J. F., Onyeibor, C. I., & Ekanem, C. E. (2025). Rethinking learner-centered teaching in early education: Lessons from a global practice perspective. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. [https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v7i5.1929)
Naomi, C., Kaptingei, S., & Rotumoi, J. (2023). Influence of teachers’ preparedness on implementation of competency-based curriculum (CBC) in public primary schools in Bomet east sub-county, Kenya. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.7104.
Patterson, J., Alsabatin, H., Anderson, A., Klepacka, M., Lawrence, J., & Miner, B. (2020). A Distributed Leadership Perspective on Implementing Instructional Reform: A Case Study of an Urban Middle School. Journal of School Leadership, 31, 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684620904942.
Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533: An Act Enhancing the Philippine Basic Education System by Strengthening Its Curriculum and Increasing the Number of Years for Basic Education. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
Stern, R. N., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1979). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.. Contemporary Sociology, 8, 612. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065200
Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00117714.
Saro, J., Montejo, C., Sucong, J., Bustamante, M., & Perez, J. (2024). A Qualitative Exploration on the Perceived Impact of the MATATAG Curriculum on Basic Education Teaching in the School Year 2024-2025. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.4.3134.
SEDL. (n.d.). Concerns‑Based Adoption Model (CBAM). https://sedl.org/cbam/
Schultz, T. (1961). Capital Formation by Education. Journal of Political Economy, 68, 571 - 583. https://doi.org/10.1086/258393
Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective. Management in Education, 30, 147 - 154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665938
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3 - 34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19–25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ048749
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/The-CIPP-Evaluation-Model/Stufflebeam-Zhang/9781462529230
Tenha, J., & Makamure, C. (2024). A contemporary examination of instructional leadership activities and distributed leadership practices in elementary education. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5, 267–295. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353105.
Thornby, K., Brazeau, G., & Chen, A. (2023). Reducing Student Workload Through Curricular Efficiency. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 87 8, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2022.12.002.
Wabingga, R. J., & Tomakin, J. L. (2024). Challenges, coping strategies, and resilience in implementing the matatag curriculum: Insights from elementary teachers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(1). [https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0614)
Winget, M., & Persky, A. (2022). A Practical Review of Mastery Learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8906.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
