The Effect of Comic-Based Realistic Mathematics Approach (RMA) on The Critical Thinking Skills of Grade 9 Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21398151Keywords:
Comic-Based RMA, critical thinking skills, mathematics education, comic-based learning, problem-solvingAbstract
This study investigated the effect of the Comic-Based Realistic Mathematics Approach (RMA) on the critical thinking skills of Grade 9 students at Wenceslao Trinidad Memorial National High School. Specifically, it examined the level of implementation of RMA in terms of the use of comic-based scenarios, application of real-life problem-solving activities, integration of mathematical concepts with comics, and frequency of student participation, as well as the students’ level of critical thinking skills in terms of analysis, evaluation, logical reasoning, and decision-making. The study employed a descriptive quantitative research design using a structured questionnaire administered to Grade 9 students. Findings revealed that the level of implementation of the Comic-Based RMA was rated excellent across all indicators, indicating that students were highly exposed to comic-based and contextualized learning strategies. Similarly, the level of students’ critical thinking skills was also found to be high, suggesting strong abilities in analyzing problems, evaluating solutions, reasoning logically, and making decisions. The study concludes that the Comic-Based Realistic Mathematics Approach is an effective instructional strategy in enhancing students’ critical thinking skills in mathematics. It is recommended that teachers integrate comic-based and contextualized learning materials into their instruction to promote engagement, deeper understanding, and higher-order thinking skills among learners.
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2018). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (2017). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (2019). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/books/in-search-of-understanding
Cohn, N. (2020). Who understands comics? Questioning the universality of visual language comprehension. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Anđić, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2023). Integrating comics in science and mathematics education: A multidisciplinary approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 45–60. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/books/how-to-assess-higher-order-thinking-skills-in-your-classroom
Cohn, N. (2020). Visual language theory: The structure of comics. Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/
Facione, P. A. (2018). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.com/
Farahani, M. (2018). The effect of comic-based learning materials on students’ comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(3), 245–260. https://www.learntechlib.org/
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2019). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gravemeijer, K. (2017). Realistic mathematics education theory and practice. Springer. https://link.springer.com/
Halpern, D. F. (2019). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press. https://www.routledge.com/
Hosler, J., & Boomer, K. B. (2016). Are comic books an effective way to engage nonmajors in learning and appreciating science? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0090
Koutníková, M. (2020). The use of comics in primary education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2537–2544. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Kuhn, D. (2019). Thinking together and alone: Logical reasoning and critical thinking. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). OECD learning framework 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/
Prince, M. (2018). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Education for sustainable development framework. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2017). Realistic mathematics education. In Springer Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 521–525). Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_170
Vygotsky, L. S. (2018). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/
World Bank. (2020). World development report: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report. WEF. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
