Linguistic and Translation Competence as Predictors of Writing Skills among Language Education Students

Authors

  • John Mark B. Traña Don Carlos Polytechnic College, Don Carlos, Bukidnon, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9297-4760
  • Marbeth G. Aringay Central Mindanao University, Maramag, Bukidnon, Philippines
  • Mary Christelle Concepcion C. Bienes Kalilangan National High School, Kalilangan Bukidnon, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0549

Keywords:

Linguistic Competence, Translation Competence, Writing Skills, Morphology, Semantics

Abstract

This study examined the relationship and predictive influence of linguistic competence and translation competence on the writing skills of language education students. Specifically, it determined the levels of linguistic competence in terms of phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics; translation competence in terms of textual competence, disposition, and monitoring skills; and writing skills in terms of correct grammar, vocabulary and lexical range, coherence and cohesion, and organization and structure. It also examined the significant relationships between linguistic competence and writing skills and between translation competence and writing skills and identified the dimensions that significantly predicted writing skills. A quantitative descriptive-correlational research design with a predictive component was employed among 250 BSED Major in Filipino students of Don Carlos Polytechnic College selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a validated research instrument and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The findings revealed that the students demonstrated high levels of linguistic competence (M = 3.70), translation competence (M = 3.73), and writing skills (M = 3.68). Linguistic competence demonstrated a strong positive and significant relationship with writing skills (r = .789, p < .001), while translation competence demonstrated a very strong positive and significant relationship with writing skills (r = .869, p < .001). The multiple regression model yielded R = .886, R² = .785, and adjusted R² = .776, indicating that the predictors collectively explained 78.5% of the variance in writing skills. At the individual predictor level, Morphology (β = 2.28, p = .045) and Semantics (β = 2.33, p = .043) significantly predicted writing skills, whereas the other dimensions did not demonstrate significant individual predictive contributions. The study concludes that linguistic and translation competencies are strongly associated with writing skills, with morphological and semantic competence emerging as significant individual predictors within the specified regression model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ait Hammou, B., Larouz, M., Fagroud, M., & Akki, F. (2023). Aspects of EFL university learners’ lexical and phraseological proficiency as predictors of writing quality. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2023.32726

Al-Ibadi, Q. H. (2022). A pragmatic competence, language proficiency and writing performance of Iraqi EFL university students: A correlational study. Journal of Basic Sciences, 8(13), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.31185/bsj.Vol8.Iss13.317

Allen, A. A., & Lembke, E. S. (2022). The effect of a morphological awareness intervention on early writing outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720912414

Asaad, H. Q. M. (2024). The role of morphological awareness in L2 postgraduates’ academic writing: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2327787. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2327787

Collins, G., Wolter, J. A., Meaux, A. B., & Alonzo, C. N. (2020). Integrating morphological awareness in a multilinguistic structured literacy approach to improve literacy in adolescents with reading and/or language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00053

Dong, D., & Chen, M.-L. (2025). Metacognitive strategies in translation: A comparative study of student and professional translators. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 890. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05289-7

Grigorakis, I., & Manolitsis, G. (2021). Longitudinal effects of different aspects of morphological awareness skills on early spelling development. Reading and Writing, 34, 945–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10098-2

Iļinska, L., Ivanova, O., & Ivanova, D. (2025). Mosaic of translation teaching: Textual competence. Research in Language, 23, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.23.15

Lee, Y. (2024). Writing quality in university students’ argumentative texts: Focusing on lexical features and rhetorical strategies. The Journal of Studies in Language, 40(3), 335–349.

Li, X., Gao, Z., & Liao, H. (2023). The effect of critical thinking on translation technology competence among college students: The chain mediating role of academic self-efficacy and cultural intelligence. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1233–1256. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S408477

Maamuujav, U., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays. Assessing Writing, 49, Article 100539.

Osawa, K. (2025). Genre-based writing instruction for secondary school students in an English as a foreign language context: Facilitating text organization and cohesion. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251375196

Palacios Briones, F. E., Gómez-Parra, M. E., & Espejo Mohedano, R. (2021). Coherence, concordance and cohesion in teaching writing. DIGILEC: Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas, 7, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.17979/digilec.2020.7.0.7189

Park, S. (2023). Grammatical accuracy among Korean EFL learners by proficiency level. The Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature, 28(4), 139–160.

Qin, W., Jia, R., & Ren, W. (2024). Pragmatic competence in an email writing task: Influences of situation, L1 background, and L2 proficiency. Written Communication, 41(4), 726–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883241263543

Quessep, I. P., Redondo Martínez, L., & Medina, B. (2024). Phonological awareness and its relationship with dictated writing. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 7(S6), 2456– 2463.

Rambe, A. A., & Daulay, S. H. (2025). Enhancing students’ linguistic by using colourful semantics game. SCOPE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 699–704. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.22548

Raufi, B. S., Mulyono, H., Ilyas, H. P., & Zulaiha, S. (2024). Exploring Indonesian EFL students’ lexical diversity and its correlation with academic vocabulary use in an online academic writing environment. Ampersand, 13, Article 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100196

Rustipa, K., Rahayu, E. Y., & Yulistiyanti. (2023). Mood analysis and self-correction to enhance EFL students’ grammatical accuracy. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 8(1), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.8.1.209-226

Salih, N. T., & Sahab, M. M. (2025). Investigating pragmatic failure of Iraqi EFL university students in academic writing. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 32(6, Part 2), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.32.6.2.2025.25

Shi, J., Shim, J., & Ryu, T. (2024). The effect of ChatGPT’s grammar and reformulation feedback on EFL college students’ writing performance. Journal of AI Humanities, 18, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.46397/JAIH.18.2

Siekmann, L., Parr, J. M., & Busse, V. (2022). Structure and coherence as challenges in composition: A study of assessing less proficient EFL writers’ text quality. Assessing Writing, 54, Article 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100672

Siregar, M., & Stroupe, R. (2025). Theoretically informed students’ worksheet based on metacognitive strategies for a translation course. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v15i1.76549

Venoza, D. L., & Ramos, L. (2026). Morphological awareness and writing proficiency in English of Grade 7 students. Philippine Journal of Basic Studies, 2. https://pjbs.pti.edu.ph/index.php/pjbs/article/view/22

Vernon, S., & Ferreiro, E. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Review, 69(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.17763/HAER.69.4.P411667586738X0W

Wang, J., Kim, Y.-S. G., Lam, J. H. Y., & Leachman, M. A. (2025). A meta-analysis of relationships between syntactic features and writing performance and how the relationships vary by student characteristics and measurement features. Assessing Writing, 63, Article 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100909

Xie, H., & Wang, P. (2025). Metacognition and translation competence: A three-level meta-analytic study. Acta Psychologica, 260, Article 105722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105722

Zeng, Z., Nair, S. M., & Wider, W. (2022). Chinese EFL undergraduates’ pragmatic competence in English letter writing. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 239. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p23

Downloads

Published

2026-11-06

How to Cite

Traña, J. M., Aringay, M., & Bienes, M. C. C. (2026). Linguistic and Translation Competence as Predictors of Writing Skills among Language Education Students. International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(10), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0549

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.