Voices from the Margins: Exploring Students’ Experiences and Academic Outcomes in Social Studies Taught in Makeshift Classrooms

Authors

  • Karen T. Dacula Sultan Kudarat State University-ACCESS Campus EJC Montilla, Tacurong City, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0953-4710
  • Nancy B. Espacio Sultan Kudarat State University-ACCESS Campus EJC Montilla, Tacurong City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0283

Keywords:

Academic Outcomes, Coping Mechanisms, Makeshift Classrooms, Social Studies Education, Teacher Adaptability

Abstract

Amid persistent classroom shortages in resource constrained educational system, makeshift classrooms have emerged as a widespread yet underexamined learning environment that may profoundly shape students’ academic experiences and outcomes.practical response to the shortage of classrooms. Nevertheless, there is limited knowledge concerning how these makeshift classrooms influence students’ educational experiences, especially in Social Studies. The study explored the lived experiences and academic performances of the students in learning Social Studies in the makeshift classrooms in Upper Sepaka Integrated School, Talahik Integrated School and Tapok Integrated School in Surallah North District. A phenomenological research design was used. Data were collected via in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The results indicated that students encountered several challenges including poor classroom conditions, instructional challenges, learning challenges and lack of involvement. Nevertheless, they showed resilience through peer collaboration, independent learning, self-regulation, and a positive mindset. Teachers also made adaptations includes interactive instruction, instructional adaptations, effective classroom management, and environmental adjustments to continue learning. However, the makeshift educational environment continued to impact on academic results with reduced engagement, interrupted learning, poor academic performance and reduced learning development. The key finding of the study is that although students and teachers can adapt to challenging learning environments, adaptation alone cannot compensate for poor classroom conditions. The findings highlight the need for better learning facilities, increased instructional support, and more responsive educational policies to provide equitable opportunities for success for students in marginalized learning spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. (2022). Techniques and strategies used in assessing Social Studies concepts. Universal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(7), 123–140.

Adigun, O. T., & others. (2019). Effects of classroom environment on academic performance of students. International Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 1–10.

Agustin, H. O., & Decano, R. S. (2021). A phenomenological study on the experiences of school heads, teachers, and learners on a makeshift classroom: Accounts on benefits, drawbacks, and insights. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 8(11).

Alam, M. (2019). Structured home study routines and academic performance in challenging learning environments. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(2), 45–58.

Bagus, R. (2025). Student engagement and learning approaches in Social Studies classrooms. International Journal of Social Science Education, 12(1), 33–47.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-98423-000

Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2019). The holistic impact of classroom spaces on learning in specific subjects. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 425–451.

Bennett, S., et al. (2018). Teaching with limited resources in challenging environments. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 1–10.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2019). Sociocultural dimensions of student motivation: Research approaches and insights from the Philippines.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2021). Student learning and resilience during educational disruptions in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 567–578.

Binayao, B. S. (2025). Classroom space, comfort, and interaction: Challenges encountered by pre-service teachers in facilitating learning. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 10(2), 47–50.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, Article 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100281

Bowyer, K., & Kahne, J. (2026). Inquiry-based learning and civic understanding in Social Studies education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 58(1), 1–15.

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching and educational adaptation. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–16.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2021). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 1–25.

Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Comparative analysis of the impact of traditional versus innovative learning environments on student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9247-0

Cassidy, S. (2019). Academic resilience and coping strategies among learners. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 1–12.

Cebelleros, J., & Buenaventura, L. (2024). Learning environments and student engagement in Social Studies. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 18(3), 55–70.

Chen, X., & Chen, Y. (2026). Inquiry-based learning and student engagement in resource-constrained classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 1–14.

Chick, R. C., Adams, A. M., Peace, K. M., Kemp Bohan, P. M., Schwantes, I. R., Clifton, G. T., Vicente, D., Propper, B., Newhook, T., Grubbs, E. G., Bednarski, B. K., & Vreeland, T. J. (2021). Using the flipped classroom model in surgical education: Efficacy and trainee perception. Journal of Surgical Education, 78(6), 1803–1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.006

Chuang, S. (2021). The applications of constructivist learning theory and social learning theory on adult continuous development. Performance Improvement, 60(3), 6–14.

Ciullo, S., & Dimino, J. (2017). Scaffolded instruction for improving reading comprehension in content areas. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(5), 1–10.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896

Cruz, I. N., Moreno, K. A., Stovall, B., & Paz de la Vega, L. (2026). Connecting the dots: Examining stressful life events, campus climate, and school engagement on academic achievement and psychological distress in a predominantly Latine sample. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 35(4), Article e70096. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70096

Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). Implications of active learning for student achievement. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 1–12.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2022). Reimagining American education: Possible futures: The policy changes we need to get there. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(8), 54–57.

David, R. (2019). Instructional resources and academic performance in basic education. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(5), 45–52.

Department of Education. (2023). Basic education report 2023. https://www.deped.gov.ph/basic-education-report-2023/

Department of Education Regional Office XI. (2024). Conduct of the National School Building Inventory for SY 2024–2025. https://depedroxi.ph

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.

Earthman, G. I. (2017). School facility conditions and student academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 1–10.

Eltahir, M. E., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2025). Impact of the flipped classroom on academic achievement, motivation, and engagement: A higher education case study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), Article ep553. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15759

EPRA Journals. (2023). A phenomenological study on the experiences of school heads, teachers, and learners in makeshift classrooms.

Erdem, C., & Kaya, M. (2024). The relationship between school and classroom climate and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 45(4), 1–20.

Fisher, D., Frey, N., Bustamante, V., & Hattie, J. (2020). The assessment playbook for online and blended learning. Corwin.

Fraser, B. J. (2021). Classroom learning environments: Assessing and investigating the learning environment. Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0287

Fredricks, J. A., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M.-T., & Brauer, S. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491–527.

Friedrich, D. (2019). Effectiveness of peer review as cooperative web-based learning method applied out-of- class in a role playing game: A case study by quasi-experimental approach. Smart Learning Environments, 6, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0084-0

Garba, M., & Aliyu, S. (2022). Scaffolding instruction and students’ conceptual understanding. African Journal of Education Studies, 9(1), 45–59.

Garrison, D. R. (2018). Self-directed learning in educational contexts. Journal of Distance Education, 39(1), 1– 18.

Gillies, R. M. (2019). Cooperative learning: Developments in research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 1–15.

Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 83–106). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048

Hattie, J. (2019). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 55–72). Sense Publishers.

Jensen, E. (2018). Teaching with the brain in mind. ASCD.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning and academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 46(2), 1–12.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/educational-research/book258088

Keser Aschenberger, F., et al. (2023). Classroom environment and student well-being: Impacts on learning outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 26, 1–15.

Kim, H.-J., & Hall, T. (2020). Student engagement and performance disparities in constrained classroom environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1105–1117.

Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). Teachers’ adaptation to challenging educational environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1062–1083.

Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7–44.

Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2020). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 3–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319887179

Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918

Levstik, L. S., & Thornton, S. J. (2018). Reconceptualizing history for early childhood through early adolescence. In S. A. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 1–23). Wiley.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book842

Martin, A. J. (2018). Academic buoyancy and resilience in education. Educational Psychology, 38(5), 1–15.

Maxwell, L. E. (2021). School building condition, social climate, and student academic achievement. Journal of Learning Environments, 14(2), 1–12.

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2017). Dialogic teaching and classroom interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 1–10.

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2018). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press.

Mitchell, M. M., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2021). Examining classroom management and student engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 86, 1–15.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/phenomenological-research-methods/book5667

Municipality of Surallah. (n.d.). Geography of Surallah, South Cotabato. https://surallah.gov.ph

National Council for the Social Studies. (2023). Position statement on powerful, purposeful teaching and learning. https://www.socialstudies.org/position-statements

Nguyen, T., et al. (2020). Motivation and learning strategies in academic performance. Learning and Instruction, 65, 1–10.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Improving school infrastructure for better learning outcomes. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264306709-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Positive, high-achieving students? What schools and teachers can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cc1f55ac-en

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2017). Self-regulated learning: Theory and applications. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Parsons, S. A., et al. (2018). Adaptive teaching practices in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 1–11.

Peng, X., et al. (2023a). Classroom environment and student engagement in learning outcomes. Educational Studies, 49(3), 1–15

Peng, X., et al. (2023b). Learning environments and student engagement: Effects on academic performance. Educational Research Review, 38, 100–112

Perez, J., & Espacio, C. (2025). Classroom environment, management challenges, and student engagement in Social Studies learning. Journal of Education Research, 18(1), 25–40.

Rance, G., Dowell, R. C., & Tomlin, D. (2023). Effects of classroom noise on children’s learning and attention. npj Science of Learning, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00161-6

Reyes, J. S. (2024a). Learning conditions in temporary classrooms and their impact on academic performance. Philippine Journal of Education Research, 32(1), 1–18.

Romer, D., et al. (2018). Attention and academic performance in distracted learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 1–14

Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from Education at a Glance. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education_ee6608f7-en.html

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Shield, B., & Dockrell, J. E. (2018). The effects of environmental noise on children’s cognition and learning. Building Acoustics, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X18768989

Siddique, M., et al. (2023). Supplementary learning materials and student academic outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 1–14.

Singh, M., Heller, J., & Heller, P. (2023). Collaborative and problem-based learning strategies in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(4), 1–15.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Stap, L., den Brok, P., de Vries, B., & van den Beemt, A. (2024). Fostering online interaction in blended learning through social presence and convergence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12894

Sulastri, I. A., et al. (2023). Collaborative learning and academic outcomes in difficult learning environments. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(3), 1–9.

Tadesse, T., & Gillies, R. M. (2019). Resource constraints and learning outcomes in developing contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 1–12.

Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50–60.

Tantiado, M. G. S., & Enriquez, J. J. A. (2025). Inside a makeshift classroom: The chronicles of neophyte teachers. Philippine Journal of Education, 45(1). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=24988

Taylan, A., & Rabago, J. (2025). Instructional strategies and student achievement in makeshift classrooms. AJESS, 12(1), 24–38.

Tolentino, Z. T. (2018). Delivery of differentiated instruction in public central schools in Region XII [Master’s thesis, Notre Dame University.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2021). Adapting teaching practices in challenging educational contexts. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(1), 1–12.

UIJRT. (2022). Unraveling students’ online collaborative experiences in Social Studies. UIJRT Journal.

Uline, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2018). The interplay of school building conditions and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 328–347.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674576292

Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2020). Classroom climate and student engagement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101345

Wineburg, S. S. (2018). Why learn history (when it’s already on your phone). The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo27506025.html

Woolfolk, A. (2021). Educational psychology (14th global ed.). Pearson.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2023). Classroom environment and cognitive performance in learners. Learning and Instruction, 85, 101–110.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2017). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–15).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Dacula, K., & Espacio, N. (2026). Voices from the Margins: Exploring Students’ Experiences and Academic Outcomes in Social Studies Taught in Makeshift Classrooms . International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(9), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0283

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.