Curriculum Complexity and Administrative Support in Instructional Effectiveness of Social Studies Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0351Keywords:
Administrative support, Curriculum complexity, Instructional effectiveness, Social Studies education, Teacher effectivenessAbstract
The increasing complexity of curricula and the provision of administrative support are important factors in teachers’ instructional effectiveness, yet their interaction remains underexplored in Social Studies education. This study examined the relationship among curriculum complexity, administrative support, and instructional effectiveness among Social Studies teachers in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected from 200 Social Studies teachers from elementary, junior high school, senior high school, and Alternative Learning System settings through structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression analysis, and moderation analysis were employed. The findings showed high levels of curriculum complexity (M = 4.37), administrative support (M = 4.17), and instructional effectiveness (M = 4.44). Curriculum complexity was positively related to instructional effectiveness (r = .54, p < .001). Regression analysis showed that curriculum complexity (B = 1.115, β = .308, p = .001) and administrative support (B = 1.081, β = .280, p = .001) significantly and positively predicted instructional effectiveness. The interaction between curriculum complexity and administrative support was significant (β = −.187, p = .013), indicating that higher administrative support attenuated the positive relationship between curriculum complexity and instructional effectiveness. The moderation model explained 42.3% of the variance in instructional effectiveness (R² = .423). These findings suggest that administrative support significantly moderates the relationship between curriculum complexity and instructional effectiveness. Strengthening instructional guidance, professional development, resource provision, and collaborative planning may help teachers effectively manage demanding curricular requirements.
References
Agcaoili, M. C., & Bascos-Ocampo, R. (2022). Teaching readiness, workload analysis and performance of teachers in Luna District. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 28(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v28i230674
Araneta, M. L. R., Catalan, R. D., & Martir, E. M. (2020). Administrative support and teaching quality: Inputs to professional development program. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i6.3134
Bongco, R. T., & David, A. P. (2020). Filipino teachers' experiences as curriculum policy implementers in the evolving K to 12 landscape. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 19–34.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
Department of Education. (2023). Pilot implementation of the MATATAG curriculum (DepEd Memorandum No. 054, s. 2023). Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG curriculum (DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024). Department of Education.
DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2014). Improving instruction: Data-driven decisions and professional learning. Information Age Publishing.
Flick, U. (2022). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design. SAGE Publications.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
Kraft, M. A., Marinell, W. H., & Yee, D. S.-W. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1449. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216667478
Kraft, M. A., Simon, N. S., & Lyon, M. A. (2021). Sustaining a sense of success: The protective role of teacher working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 14(4), 727–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1938314
Li, Y., Cai, Y., & Tang, R. (2023). Linking instructional leadership and school support to teacher expertise: The mediating effect of teachers’ professional development agency. Sustainability, 15(4), 3440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043440
Lingatong, E. E., Abrigo, M. R. M., Aranzanso, D. J. F., Berroya, J. D., Daga, E. D. J. C., Gonzales, J. F. D., Ignacio, M. A. C., Macaraig, D. L., Pablo, C. V., Pineda, C. C., Sister, J. M. A. A., & Villasor, R. (2025). Teaching through transition: What influences teachers’ practices amidst curriculum reform (PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2025-45). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.45
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Curriculum overload: A way forward. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3081ceca-en
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
Shogbesan, Y. O., Adeoye, M. A., Osaro-Martins, B. E., & Shabi, Z. (2024). Perceived influence of administrative support on secondary school teachers’ effectiveness. Evaluation Studies in Social Sciences, 5(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.37134/esss.vol5.2.7.2024
Thornton, S. J. (2017). Teaching social studies that matters: Curriculum for active learning. Teachers College Press.
Tosun, A., & Bozkurt Bostancı, A. (2024). The role of administrative support in the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of organizational support and teacher leadership levels. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428306
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







