Reframing Mathematics Learning in Philippine Public Schools: A Qualitative Analysis of Curriculum Reforms and Numeracy Policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0331Keywords:
assessment, foundational numeracy, learning recovery, mathematical reasoning, teacher professional developmentAbstract
Mathematics education reforms shape what learners are expected to know and do, while also influencing how mathematics is taught and assessed in public schools. In the Philippines, recent reforms have responded to persistent learning gaps by placing greater emphasis on foundational competencies and numeracy. However, limited research has examined how these priorities are collectively reflected across curriculum, assessment, and learning recovery policies. This study addressed this gap through a qualitative analysis of publicly available Philippine education documents, examining how mathematics learning is framed across curriculum reforms and related policy initiatives. The documents reviewed included the K to 12 Mathematics Curriculum Guide, MATATAG Mathematics Curriculum Guide, assessment and learning recovery policies, the National Learning Camp, the National Learning Recovery Program, the Basic Education Development Plan 2030, and related mathematics education reports. The documents were analyzed thematically to identify recurring ideas, shifts in priorities, and connections among mathematical competencies, instructional expectations, and intended learner outcomes. The findings point to a shift from an emphasis on curriculum coverage and procedural skills toward foundational numeracy, conceptual understanding, mathematical reasoning, problem solving, and meaningful application. The documents also emphasize learner-centered, differentiated, inclusive, and assessment-informed instruction, together with teacher professional competence and targeted learner support. The study contributes an integrated policy-level view of these priorities by examining how they connect across multiple reforms rather than treating individual programs in isolation. The findings support continued efforts to strengthen curriculum coherence, teacher development, assessment, technology integration, and sustained learner support.
References
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Boaler, J. (2022). Math-ish: Finding creativity, diversity, and meaning in mathematics. HarperCollins.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Cologon, K., & Mevawalla, Z. (2018). Increasing inclusion in early childhood: Key Word Sign as a communication partner intervention. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(8), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412515
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015: Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum: Mathematics Curriculum Guide. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016: Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2020: Interim guidelines for assessment and grading in light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum Guide: Mathematics. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2023: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the National Learning Camp. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2023: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the National Learning Recovery Program in response to learning loss. Department of Education, Philippines.
Department of Education. (2023). Basic Education Development Plan (BEDP) 2030. Department of Education, Philippines.
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers’ professional work. Journal of Professional Capital and Community.
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Catalyzing change in high school mathematics: Initiating critical conversations. NCTM.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
Orbeta, A. C., Paqueo, V. B., & Albert, J. R. G. (2019). The Philippines’ basic education system: Strengthening effective learning outcomes. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. S. (2018). The role of curriculum coherence in improving mathematics achievement. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50, 1–13.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
UNESCO. (2021). Sub-education crisis: The importance of foundational learning and learning recovery. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2022). Where are we on education recovery?. UNESCO.
UNICEF, UNESCO, & World Bank. (2021). Where are we on education recovery? A policy brief. UNICEF.
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
World Bank. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Shocks to education and policy responses. World Bank.
World Bank. (2022). Collapse and recovery: How COVID-19 eroded human capital and what to do about it. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







