Teaching Strategies and Students’ Academic Performance In An Inclusive Classroom

Authors

  • Mary Mae C. Galanida Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University, Zamboanga City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18833663

Keywords:

Inclusive Education, Teaching Strategies, Academic Performance, Differentiated Instruction, Classroom Management, Student Engagement

Abstract

This study examined the level of teaching strategies employed in inclusive classrooms and their relationship to students’ academic performance at Immaculate Conception Archdiocesan School Mercedes, Philippines. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, the study assessed five dimensions of teaching strategies: classroom management, differentiated instruction, lesson preparation, learning climate, and student engagement. Data was collected through structured questionnaires administered to teachers and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation. Results revealed that teaching strategies were implemented at a high level across all dimensions, with grand mean scores ranging from 3.55 to 3.67. Students’ academic performance was rated as Very Satisfactory (GWA = 85.73). However, correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between teaching strategies and academic performance (r = -0.147, p = 0.15), suggesting that other factors, such as student motivation, prior knowledge, or socio-emotional support, may influence learning outcomes. The findings indicate that while inclusive teaching strategies promote engagement, participation, and a positive classroom environment, enhancing academic performance may require a more holistic approach. Recommendations include continuous teacher professional development, individualized support for learners, and strategies to integrate instructional practices with broader academic and socio-emotional support systems.

References

Almeqdad, Q., Alawneh, M., & Saleh, A. (2023). Universal design for learning and academic achievement in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(6), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2034567

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.

Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Bantillo, M. L. (2024). Inclusive teaching practices in Philippine basic education classrooms. Philippine Journal of Education, 99(1), 45–58.

Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Motivation and engagement in learning environments: The role of adaptive teaching practices. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1529813

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deysolong, J. A. (2023). Cooperative learning strategies and students’ academic engagement. International Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102140.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102140

Dhakal, S. (2024). Differentiated instruction and learner engagement in diverse classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.1956234

Dhakal, S. (2024). Differentiated instruction and learner engagement in diverse classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.1956234

Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Endro, J. P. (2023). Differentiated instruction and learner diversity in Philippine schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(2), 78–86.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Galanida , M. M. (2026). Teaching Strategies and Students’ Academic Performance In An Inclusive Classroom. International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18833663

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.