The Learning Barriers in Mathematics: Students’ Academic Performance and Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19000686Keywords:
academic performance, affective barriers, cognitive barriers, environmental barriers, mathematics learning, learning barriers.Abstract
Learning barriers in mathematics remain a significant concern in secondary education, as they may influence students’ engagement, learning experiences, and academic outcomes. This study examined the common learning barriers in mathematics and their relationship to the academic performance of Junior High School students at Buenavista Integrated School during the School Year 2025–2026. Specifically, the research investigated cognitive, affective, and environmental barriers and explored students’ learning experiences in mathematics. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data were collected from 119 Junior High School students using a structured survey questionnaire, while qualitative insights were obtained from interviews with selected participants. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze the quantitative data. The findings revealed that students moderately experienced learning barriers across cognitive (M = 2.90), affective (M = 2.91), and environmental (M = 2.91) dimensions. Students’ academic performance in mathematics was rated satisfactory, with a mean grade of 83.45 (SD = 4.57). However, correlation analysis indicated no statistically significant relationship between learning barriers and students’ mathematics performance (r = −0.045, p = 0.626), suggesting that other factors may influence academic achievement. Qualitative findings further revealed that students struggled with complex mathematical concepts, relied heavily on teacher explanations and examples, experienced varying levels of home learning support, and reported anxiety during mathematics assessments. The study highlights the importance of addressing cognitive, emotional, and environmental factors in mathematics instruction. Strengthening instructional clarity, providing sufficient practice opportunities, and fostering supportive classroom and home learning environments may help improve students’ engagement and learning experiences in mathematics.
Downloads
References
Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets and the development of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1067349
Boaler, J., Dieckmann, J. A., LaMar, T., Leshin, M., Selbach-Allen, M., & Pérez-Núñez, G. (2021). The transformative impact of a mathematical mindset experience taught at scale. Frontiers in Education, 6, 784393. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.784393
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk: The role of school resources. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.194
Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). Mathematics anxiety and the affective domain in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217475
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
