The Influence of Management Style on Employee Satisfaction and Job Performance Among Selected Hotel Personnel

Authors

  • Danica Kate E. Milano College of International Tourism and Hospitality Management, Lyceum of the Philippines University – Cavite
  • Alecxis Denise D. Araojo College of International Tourism and Hospitality Management, Lyceum of the Philippines University – Cavite
  • Arabella Grace D. Baquir College of International Tourism and Hospitality Management, Lyceum of the Philippines University – Cavite
  • Gia Jean L. Sevilla College of International Tourism and Hospitality Management, Lyceum of the Philippines University – Cavite
  • Rogelyn B. Icoy College of International Tourism and Hospitality Management, Lyceum of the Philippines University – Cavite

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20501029

Keywords:

Bayleaf Hotel, Employee Satisfaction, Hospitality Industry, Job Performance, Management Style

Abstract

This study assesses the influence of different management styles—Supportive, Directive, Participative, and Achievement-Oriented—on job performance and satisfaction among employees at The Bayleaf Hotel Cavite. Grounded in the Path-Goal Theory, the Job Characteristics Model, and the Social Exchange Theory, the research analyzes how leadership styles impact critical job attributes, including autonomy, skill variety, feedback, task significance, and task identity. Utilizing a quantitative-descriptive research design with correlation analysis, data were collected from 61 hotel employees through a validated online survey. Results indicate that the Achievement-Oriented and Directive management styles had the most positive effect on job performance and employee satisfaction. The Achievement-Oriented style significantly influenced all five job characteristics, with strong statistical effects on Autonomy (p < .001), Skill Variety (p < .001), Task Identity (p < .001), Task Significance (p = .003), and Feedback (p = .013). The Directive style showed significant positive effects on Task Significance (p = .012) and Feedback (p = .043). In contrast, the Participative (overall mean = 3.21) and Supportive (overall mean = 3.22) styles demonstrated weaker effectiveness in highly structured tasks, yielding no statistically significant impact on core job characteristics (p > .05). The study concludes that adopting a progressive, adaptive, and structured leadership style is crucial for creating an engaged workforce in the hospitality industry, recommending that hotel management align leadership approaches with employee needs and situational conditions to enhance overall service quality.

References

Agvolumes. (2022). Management strategies in the hospitality industry: Exploring department-specific approaches to leadership. AG Volumes. https://agvolumes.com/Books-AG/index.php/AGvolumes/article/view/223

Ali, B. H., Mohammed, B. A., & Qays, M. A. (2021). Hotel service quality: The impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in hospitality. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351780048

Badr El-Deen, R., & Ali, A. (2021). The impact of strategic leadership styles on financial business performance and sustainable competitive advantage in travel agencies and hotels. International Journal of Heritage, Tourism and Hospitality, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21608/IJHTH.2021.196924

Bailo, A. (2023). Why the path-goal theory of leadership is essential at work. SC Training. https://training.safetyculture.com/blog/path-goal-theory-in-online-leadership-training/

Brown, R., Singh, K., & Rivera, M. (2024). Long tenure and employee engagement: Re-examining loyalty in the hospitality sector. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655241255004

Clark, R. A., Hartline, M. D., & Jones, K. C. (2009). The effects of leadership style on hotel employees' commitment to service quality. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965508329661

De Souza Meira, J. V., & Hancer, M. (2021). Using the social exchange theory to explore the employee–organization relationship in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(2), 670–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2020-0538

Elsetouhi, A. M., Mohamed Elbaz, A., & Soliman, M. (2023). Participative leadership and its impact on employee innovative behavior through employee voice in tourism SMEs. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 23(3), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584221100523

Fabac, R., Kokot, K., & Bubalo, I. (2022). Path-goal theory: Leadership styles and their changes during COVID-19 pandemic. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 20(4), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.20.4.4

Ghrairi, A. M. (2024). Impact of leadership style on job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of management control systems. Corporate Ownership & Control, 21(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv21i1art12

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Milano, D. K., Araojo, A. D., Baquir, A. G., Sevilla, G. J., & Icoy, R. (2026). The Influence of Management Style on Employee Satisfaction and Job Performance Among Selected Hotel Personnel. International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20501029

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.