Influencing Factor in Senior High School Strand Preference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18975919Keywords:
Academic Performance, Demographic Profile, Environmental Factors, Personal Influence, Strand PreferenceAbstract
This study examined the factors influencing strand preference among Grade 10 students at Buenavista Integrated School in Zamboanga City, Philippines, during the School Year 2025–2026. Specifically, the study investigated how selected demographic characteristics (age, sex, socioeconomic status, and academic performance) and contextual influences (family, peers, personal factors, and environmental considerations) shape students’ choices among the General Academic Strand (GAS), Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS), and Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL). A descriptive–quantitative research design was employed, involving 73 Grade 10 students who were selected as respondents. Data were gathered using a structured survey questionnaire and analyzed through frequency distribution, mean scores, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlation analysis to determine the significance of the identified variables on strand preference. The results revealed that HUMSS was the most preferred strand (39.7%), followed by TVL (32.9%) and GAS (27.4%). Most respondents were aged 14–16 years old (91.8%), female (72.6%), and from middle-income families (74.0%), with an average academic performance categorized as satisfactory (M = 82.32). In terms of influencing factors, personal influence (M = 3.05) and environmental influence (M = 3.00) were rated as moderately influential, followed by family influence (M = 2.68), while peer influence (M = 2.37) had the lowest level of influence. Statistical analysis further indicated that age (p = .003), sex (p = .011), and socioeconomic status (p = .048) significantly influenced students’ strand preferences, while academic performance showed no significant influence on strand preference. The findings suggest that students’ strand choices are shaped by a complex interaction of demographic characteristics and contextual influences rather than academic performance alone. These results highlight the importance of strengthening school-based career guidance programs, enhancing academic and career counseling services, and providing equitable support mechanisms to assist students in making informed educational decisions aligned with their interests, abilities, and future career aspirations.
References
Akosah-Twumasi, P., Emeto, T. I., Lindsay, D., Tsey, K., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2018). A systematic review of factors that influence youths’ career choices: The role of culture. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00058
Alim, N. H. (2024). Choice of strand among senior high school students: Perspectives, problems and opportunities. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(12), 5383–5386. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i12-03
Alvarez, R. (2025). Income-based perception of factors affecting senior high school strand choice of Grade 10 students in Morong District. Philippine Journal of Education Research and Development, 12(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15035320
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Education and socioeconomic status. https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/education
Arango, R. J. E., & Labo, A. D. (2019). Cultural factors that affect the Technical-Vocational-Livelihood strand preferences of Grade 11 students. International Journal of Science and Research, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20203956
Arthur, N., Lei, D., & Woodend, J. (2023). From near and afar: International secondary school students' career influences. Journal of Career Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453221094309
Asadianfam, S., Shamsi, M., & Asadianfam, S. (2015). Predicting academic major of students using Bayesian networks: The case of Iran. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01648
Ayat, S. O. (2025). Senior high school strand preferences of Grade 10 students: Basis for enhanced career guidance program. Pantao: The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 3512–3521. https://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403320
Bacaling, M. D., Dizon, P. T., & Orpilla, L. T. (2021). Senior high school track and strand preference using the SOAR intervention program. Sapienza International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v2i2.96
Badilla, A. E., & Dioso, E. D. (2023). Preference in senior high school strand: A descriptive study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(8), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2013
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







